Find the gaps before you publish.
Pre-publication evidence checking for serious creators.
The company stole $20 million.
Prosecutors alleged the company misappropriated approximately $20 million.
Your script sounds right. Is the evidence behind it right?
How it works
- 00:01:01
Send your script
Before you record. Include your sources if you have them.
- 00:01:02
We audit every claim
Evidence strength; primary versus secondary; whether your “multiple sources” are actually independent; allegation versus established fact; freshness.
- 00:01:03
You get the Evidence Report
Every claim gets a status, its sources, and — where wording overstates — a rewrite you can paste straight in.
What we catch
Six of the ways a sentence ends up saying more than its sources do. Each example is the kind of line that reaches us.
- Supported with QualificationCLM-014
Allegation stated as fact
The chief executive defrauded investors of $4 million.
- Insufficient EvidenceCLM-027
Fake source independence
Three separate outlets confirmed the figure.
- OutdatedCLM-031
Outdated claims
It remains the largest settlement of its kind on record.
- Supported with QualificationCLM-046
Numbers without context
Complaints rose by 300 percent after the merger.
- DisputedCLM-052
Quotes out of context
He called the project a disaster.
- DisputedCLM-063
Missing counter-evidence
No credible expert disputes the finding.
What makes this different
Most tools ask whether a claim appears true. We ask whether the exact sentence you’re about to publish says more than the evidence supports.
Pricing
First script 50% off — we're earning our reputation.
